Random collection of amazing stuff

Posted on 2007-08-24 by Graham Lee

The most cool thing that I noticed today ever is that Google Maps now allows you to add custom waypoints by dragging-and-dropping the route line onto a given road. This is great! I’m going to a charity biker raffle thing in Pensford next weekend, and Google’s usual recommendation is that I stay on the M4 to Bristol, and drive through Bristol towards Shepton Mallet. This is, frankly, ludicrous. It’s much more sensible to go through Bath and attack the A37 from the South, and now I can let Google know that.

Trusted JDS is über-cool. Not so much the actual functionality, which is somewhere between being pointy-haired enterprisey nonsense and NSA-derived “we require this feature, we can’t tell you why, or what it is, or how it should work, but implement it because I’m authorised to shoot you and move in with your wife” fun. But implementing Mandatory Access Control in a GUI, and having it work, and make sense, is one hell of an achievement. Seven hells, in the case of Trusted Openlook, of which none are achievement. My favourite part of TJDS is that the access controls are checked by pasteboard actions, so trying to paste Top Secret text into an Unrestricted e-mail becomes a no-no.

There does exist Mac MAC (sorry, I’ve also written “do DO” this week) support, in the form of SEDarwin, but (as with SELinux) most of the time spent in designing policies for SEDarwin actually boils down to opening up enough permissions to stop from breaking stuff – and that stuff mainly breaks because the applications (or even the libraries on which those applications are based) don’t expect to not be allowed to, for instance, talk to the pasteboard server. In fact, I’m going to save this post as a draft, then kill pbs and see what happens.

Hmmm… that isn’t what I expected. I can actually still copy and paste text (probably uses a different pasteboard mechanism). pbs is a zombie, though. Killed an app by trying to copy an image out of it, too, and both of these symptoms would seem to fit with my assumption above; Cocoa just doesn’t know what to do if the pasteboard server isn’t available. If you started restricting access to it (and probably the DO name servers and distributed notification centres too) then you’d be in a right mess.

Posted in cocoa, darwin, whatevs | Leave a comment

It’s update o’clock

Posted on 2007-08-18 by Graham Lee

In other words, it’s "Graham remembers that someone needs to write the interwebs, too" time. The main reason I haven’t written in a while is that I’m enjoying the new job, so it’s satiating my hacking desires. No hacking projects = nothing to talk about. I can’t really talk about the work stuff, either; this is unfortunate because I did some really cool KVC-cheating in a prototype app I wrote, and it’d be a good article to describe that.

I’ve more or less dropped off the GNUstep radar recently. I still need to talk to the employers’ legal eagles in order to update my FSF copyright assignment, and then find something to hack on. Currently I only have a Mac OS X machine so I’d probably switch to some app-level stuff. I have half a plan in my mind for a SOPE app, but despite reading all the documentation I still haven’t worked out how to get started :-|. The code isn’t too much of a problem, I’ve used WebObejcts before, but WebObjects has a ‘hit this button to build and run your WebObjects code’ button, and there’s no description AFAICT for SOPE of what to put in the GNUmakefile to get built and running SOPE code, even whether you’re supposed to provide your own main() or anything. Hmmm…I wonder if there’s a sample project around…

Posted in cocoa, gnustep, SOPE | Leave a comment

Ich habe mein Handy verloren

Posted on 2007-07-14 by Graham Lee

Ooops. Left my mobile phone on holiday in Germany when I came back. This may explain why some people who were expecting to hear from me in Germany didn’t…anyway, could anyone who thinks I ought to know their phone number please either leave a private comment on this livejournal entry (all comments are private by default on that post), or e-mail me? Thankyou! I promise to buy a filofax which I won’t leave in foreign parts.

Posted in crosspost | Leave a comment

The new netiquette

Posted on 2007-06-21 by Graham Lee

It used to be that netiquette was all about TURNING OFF THE CAPS LOCK, making sure that the subject matched the content, that you didn’t go off the wall if someone didn’t reply to your e-mail in a few minutes, that sort of thing. In fact, this (RFC1855) sort of thing. But now there are different netiquette requirements, and no obvious guidelines, nor seemingly any common practices. Now I’m just the kind of person who thinks that some de facto ruleset would be useful, so that everyone knows what to expect from everyone else.

For instance, take social networking sites like LinkedIn or Facebook. How well do you know someone before you ‘add’ them as a friend? Once met at a conference, once read their blog, cohabited for two years? Do you talk to them first, to let them know who you are and that you’re not a crazy stalker? If someone adds you, and you don’t know who they are, do you accept or reject by default? Do you ask them who they are? If they claim to have met you at $conference or in $pub, do you accept that, ask for a photo, or what?

Posted in meta-interwebs | Leave a comment

A bit late for that, isn’t it?

Posted on 2007-06-19 by Graham Lee

Just won the above-linkied item on eBay: the Amiga SDK :-) I’m probably slightly late to make any money out of Amiga development, but I’m glad I finally get to tinker. Might have to crack open the AROS if I get sufficiently involved…

I could probably write a three-page rant about how great the Amiga was and how badly Commodore stuffed up. But of course, none of it would be new ;-).

Posted in Amiga | 2 Comments

Apple and Google sitting in a tree, f-i-g-h…erm…t-i-ng

Posted on 2007-06-13 by Graham Lee

This really came out of a throwaway comment I made on Daniel, but it seems popular to pick apart every last iota of Steveness from the WWDC keynote, and I’m nothing if not popular. So here we go.

What is WebClip? In fact, that’s not really the question I want to be asking. We know what WebClip is; it’s a technology which lets users see only the bits of web pages that those users want to see. The real question is what does that mean? Well, I know which bits of a web page I usually want to see; they’re the bits which aren’t adverts.

I’m going to go out on a bit of a limb, and guess that the way WebClip works (I’m not a WWDC bod so I don’t have any more access to the new stuff than anyone else; in fact I haven’t even downloaded the Safari 3 beta) is by observing which DOM elements are within the clipped region, and downloading only media relevant to those elements. If that’s the case, then you can ignore the fact that the ads on the page don’t get seen; they don’t even get downloaded. Therefore if I’m reading, say, the Dilbert strip in a WebClip, I’m effectively getting free Dilbert, even more free than the free website because I’m not upping their ad impression count.

One thing I noticed about the various sites that Steve clipped is that as far as I can remember, none of them features ‘Ads by Google’. It would be quite embarrassing for Apple’s CEO to demonstrate how to reduce revenue for one of Apple’s most prominent board members in a world-broadcast keynote talk. As over 99% of Google’s revenue is from online ads, and Eric Schmidt (CEO of Google) is on the Apple board, that is exactly what Steve was showing us, though. There’ll be a doughnut fight back at Infinite Loop over that, I expect.

Posted in Business, leopard | Leave a comment

Miniwindows

Posted on 2007-06-11 by Graham Lee

Maybe it’s just me who gets annoyed by teeny-tiny miniaturised views which are completely illegible. Even so, I’ve just uploaded an article I wrote on Miniwindows which can be used in any OpenStep implementation such as Cocoa or GNUstep. It’s based on the Hillegass TypingTutor example, but doesn’t really use any code from that and isn’t (I hope) otherwise reliant on that context, so it should be possible to see what’s going on even if you haven’t read Hillegass. Which you should ;-)

Posted in cocoa, gnustep, openstep | Leave a comment

Moving on

Posted on 2007-06-06 by Graham Lee

There has been some cat-escaping-bagness, which is mainly my fault, but now that it’s all official I’m going to ‘announce’ it myself: I’ve got a new job! From the end of July, I’ll be working at Sophos as Senior Software Engineer, Mac (the post is still up at the linky in the title, for the moment).

This looks like being an exciting time – I’ve been enjoying the ObjC hacking I do with Brainstorm and this will be an opportunity to do even more of that, and the move from services to user-installed apps will bring its own changes and new experiences.

Erm, that really is all for now. More info as it becomes available, and all that.

Posted in cocoa, personal | 3 Comments

A bit of backup script

Posted on 2007-05-12 by Graham Lee

Good news – there’s a handy tool in OS X called wait4path which can help when writing timed scripts to backup to removable media.

Bad news – it [at least in Tiger….] works slightly esoterically – if a path is already present, it will still wait for another mount kevent before exiting. It should therefore be used in a script like this:


#!/bin/sh

if [ ! -d /Volumes/Backups ]; then
echo "waiting for backup volume..."
/bin/wait4path /Volumes/Backups
fi

# do some backups

Note, however, that if you do this in a crontab job it could potentially wait for a very long time, so you should wrap all that with a /var/run style semaphore.

Posted in darwin, sysadmin | Leave a comment

Official Google Mac Blog: Measuring performance of distributed notifications

Posted on 2007-05-11 by Graham Lee

Official Google Mac Blog: Measuring performance of distributed notifications on the performance of Google Update: “Just how expensive is it? How many notifications can you broadcast per second? As with all Google client products, we want to be good citizens and not bog down the client machine.”

A noble sentiment, but dear Google, answer me this: just how many times per second is each app going to be checking for updates? When does this become an important factor, and not a question of premature optimisation? They decided to go for distributed notifications instead of distributed objects, which seems reasonable – not because of the overhead issues (in fact a DO is probably a lot cheaper, if written properly), but because of the kind of information they’re trying to get through this IPC.

Posted in whatevs | 3 Comments