Non-subscription updates means charged?


p>The justification for the iPod Touch upgrade fee (to enable the new apps, which are actually deployed-but-disabled by a free firmware upgrade) is the same as the justification given for the MacBook wireless upgrade fee last year – that adding new features to a product that isn’t sold as a subscription service needs to be charged for. That in itself is odd – it means that the regulators in the States get to set a price (if not the price) for hitherto free products offered by companies. But it raises a more interesting question – what constitutes a new feature? If a bugfix renders a previously-unusable feature usable, is that charged for? If a security fix makes it possible to use a system in a different environment, should that be charged for?

This entry was posted in Business. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.